The result was Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:08, 20 September 2009 (UTC) reply
It's with some reluctance that I nominate an article that has a certain bathetic appeal, but that asserts minimal significance; that even for this assertion relies on sourcing that's demonstrably unreliable (see its talk page), minimal, and laughably credulous; and that has other issues besides. However, it's sported warning templates quite long enough. Hoary ( talk) 00:42, 1 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Nomination withdrawn. Although I think immediately above Dgabbard overstates the case for Ringer, and although Ringer seems only to have been noticed by a single, local publication, that publication itself seems article-worthy and this article is now scrupulously compiled. Incidentally, my own sagging bookshelves contain several volumes of photographs from the miraculously preserved collections of negatives of this or that photographer -- Victor Barsokevitsch ( fi:Victor Barsokevitsch), Johannes Pääsuke, etc) -- and I wish all the best for Ringer's afterlife. -- Hoary ( talk) 08:33, 17 September 2009 (UTC) reply