The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep It doesn't seem like blatent promotion to me, and there are third party sources available on the net (several are already cited, albeit improperly) This artive may need a bit of work to conform to
WP:NOPV, but I don't think it should be deleted.
Millermk90 (
talk)
07:50, 10 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete No doubt it is a worthy cause. But aside from the odd celebrity endorsement, this charity gets little or no coverage from Reliable Sources. --
MelanieN (
talk)
03:27, 17 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.