The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Yeah, he has written for reliable publication-houses but that does not count towards notability and he fails
WP:NAUTHOR by a mile. Neither does he pass
WP:NACADEMIC nor does he pass
WP:NFILMMAKER. In totality, the subject fails the
general notability guidelines as well as the
subject notability guidelines comprehensively.
Delete - There's just not enough here to meet notability requirements and with their company article being deleted under G11, my view is just reinforced. Ravensfire (
talk)
15:19, 23 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. The Times of India source appears to cover him in-depth, from a reliable source. Everything else is quotes not coverage and spam and churnalism and unreliability and promotionalism. Even if more than one good source were to surface,
WP:TNT would apply. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
19:10, 23 January 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.