- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Hello, Brother
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録 21:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hello, Brother ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This movie doesn't seem to have any indepth coverage in non-database reliable sources, which means that it fails WP:NMOVIE and WP:GNG. RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録 21:00, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 03:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 03:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep added roughly 20 (mostly Korean) newspaper articles about production, release, and reception. Mainly notable for its odd fundraising model. 59.149.124.29 ( talk) 06:10, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per the improvements made to the article. The depth of coverage is significant, as is the fact that it was the second highest grossing films. Appears to now meet WP:GNG. Valenciano ( talk) 08:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.