The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Well you have about 6 days before this ends, do you think you can build those sources into the article and give it a proper reception section?--
Kung Fu Man (
talk)
15:43, 3 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Doubt that he will further, most of the additions doesn't help the article's notability since those were just merchandise and promotion stuff.
GlatorNator (
ᴛ)
16:08, 3 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Sadly, I've added all I could find. I realize some of it is low-quality and routine, but I think there are a few pieces of good SIGCOV to establish notability.
QuicoleJR (
talk)
16:54, 3 June 2023 (UTC)reply
This mostly just looks like trivial listicle stuff. Pretty certain Wikipedia doesn't treat Cracked as reliable either. I don't think there's enough here to change my mind.
Sergecross73msg me20:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)reply
For the AFD closer, as I've been pinged to this keep vote: The sources added do not sway my view. This still fails SIGCOV and should/can be merged. --
ferret (
talk)
19:34, 3 June 2023 (UTC)reply
This guy is bizarre, he nominated a bunch of articles for deletion before and even tagged notability template on notable characters like
Nakoruru, but now he wanted to keep an article that is much... worst?
GlatorNator (
ᴛ)
23:59, 3 June 2023 (UTC)reply
I thought that this should be notable, so I tried to save it. Looking back, it's in kinda poor condition, so I think I'm going to go Weak Merge.
QuicoleJR (
talk)
00:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Really? This is SIGCOV? The first is 90% regurgitation of social media posts, with no commentary of its own. The second is joke article about throwing objects in Half-Life Alyx. It makes no commentary *about* head crabs. And the third literally makes a passing mention as "the signature enemy" and never mentions or makes any further commentary. None of this is SIGCOV. --
ferret (
talk)
14:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Headcrabs are not a character, they are a species. AFAIK, Lamarr is the only headcrab that features as an actual minor character.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
05:03, 4 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.