The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Subject of the article is not notable in any way and seems like any regular person. He has no reliable sourcing and should be deleted.
🌺Kori🌺 - (
@)
18:24, 12 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep: I added a few new sources. I could not find a good source for his birth or issue, but he is mentioned several times as capturing a castle and ruling for 7+ years. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Mbdfar (
talk •
contribs)
Delete: I don't think ruling a castle 600 years ago meets notability guidelines, especially since there is no page for the castle itself and as previously mentioned he has no page on Czech Wikipedia.
Zoozaz1 (
talk)
Keep per sources added by
Mbdfar. Sourcing is a separate challenge, but it's difficult to imagine the 20th century version of this guy having his notability questioned. Capturing and imprisoning a lord for seven years doesn't sound like "any regular person", especially if we are still discussing it 600 years later. And regarding the Czech wikipedia, it is very patchy in coverage and whether or not it has an article is not a particularly good indicator of anything.
Jdcooper (
talk)
00:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.