From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle ( talk) 16:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Havel Medek of Valdek (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article is not notable in any way and seems like any regular person. He has no reliable sourcing and should be deleted. 🌺Kori🌺 - ( @) 18:24, 12 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 03:07, 13 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 03:07, 13 April 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: I don't think ruling a castle 600 years ago meets notability guidelines, especially since there is no page for the castle itself and as previously mentioned he has no page on Czech Wikipedia. Zoozaz1 ( talk)
  • Delete - even if everything is true, he fails WP:GNG. Bearian ( talk) 21:11, 17 April 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per sources added by Mbdfar. Sourcing is a separate challenge, but it's difficult to imagine the 20th century version of this guy having his notability questioned. Capturing and imprisoning a lord for seven years doesn't sound like "any regular person", especially if we are still discussing it 600 years later. And regarding the Czech wikipedia, it is very patchy in coverage and whether or not it has an article is not a particularly good indicator of anything. Jdcooper ( talk) 00:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Needs to be further commentary beyond the WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST argument
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Amanda (aka DQ) 08:04, 20 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidh e 07:03, 27 April 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.