The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete as nominator As of now, the subject of this article does not meet notability requirements established by
WP:GNG. He is also not inherently notable for his comments about
Dan Crenshaw, which yielded some media attention outside of his YouTube bubble per
WP:BLP1E. If others are opposed to an outright delete, I would support a redirect to
The Young Turks.
KidAd (
talk)
01:17, 3 February 2020 (UTC)reply
These comments are untrue. He's not a principal on TYT and never has been; he is almost never on the main show... he does Facebook videos. (FB views are notoriously unreliable because they autoplay and views count almost immediately even if you scroll past or turn them off.) It's not even clear that he even works for them anymore; the last video posted here was on Dec. 12:
[1] It looks like TYT has ended this "Breakdown" experiment, because Francis Maxwell also appears to be gone. And he is certainly not and has never been "very notable in American media circles". He makes FB videos FFS; he's not Don Lemon. That other TYT presenters have pages is a nonsense argument. They earned their pages based on their own notability, not simply because they work for TYT. In any case, I say don't delete; redirect to
The Young TurksBueller 007 (
talk)
05:53, 3 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Going through the sources in the article, the Cosmo piece is qualifying coverage - is there any other qualifying coverage? It can be hard to find for streamers.
SportingFlyerT·C12:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete or redirect. The only notable part is the controversy section. Bring him back if he says three or four more things that make national news. If he disappears into obscurity in a couple of years — which is probably more likely — he ultimately wasn't notable. --
Dorama28518:18, 05 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete or redirect. His
Youtube-channel, from which he earns the most notability/gained the most controversy, only has 64.6K subscribers. According to
WP:NYOUTUBE, only 9% of the Youtubers with >100K subscribers survive an AfD. The number of subscribers *does* have bearing on notability according to the second point of
WP:ENT. Thus, I do not mind recreation of the article if mr. Piker's channel passes the 100,000-mark. Regards,
Jeff5102 (
talk)
11:34, 7 February 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.