The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Wizardman 00:43, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Non-notable software that was tagged for third party references one year and still does not have any. Existing sources are forums, blogs, the developer, and then some sources that verify facts in the article, but those are about Unicode, not this client.
Miami33139 (
talk) 03:44, 26 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete: All that I can find for significant coverage is
[1]. Fails
WP:N.
Joe Chill (
talk) 23:32, 26 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Tim Song (
talk) 05:38, 3 December 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.