- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:05, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
HD 49306
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- HD 49306 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NASTRO. Rarely have I seen a star with so little coverage. It is in the Tess Input Catalog, but nothing interesting was found. It is Numbere 1 in the constellation by Gould, but that's a fairly obscure catalogue to start with, and a fairly obscure constellation. Lithopsian ( talk) 14:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Lithopsian ( talk) 14:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - None of the references are articles about this specific star. Not a naked eye object. Not notable. PopePompus ( talk) 00:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.