The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. For both notability and copyright reasons, as either point would suffice to justify deletion here. Redirects can be added at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 10:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Hélène de Kuegelgen

Hélène de Kuegelgen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no apparent notability .the references refer to her only incidentally in connection with her partner. DGG ( talk ) 09:47, 27 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 10:01, 27 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 11:35, 27 July 2019 (UTC) reply

• Redirect to Dora Ohlfsen-Bagge, her partner. RebeccaGreen ( talk) 11:52, 27 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:19, 27 July 2019 (UTC) reply

• Delete as a presumptive copyright violation; the author was blocked for an extensive history of copyright infringement. MER-C 15:26, 27 July 2019 (UTC) reply
• Merge to Dora Ohlfsen-Bagge her partner was notable, can't see a hook here and notability isn't inherited. W C M _email 18:17, 27 July 2019 (UTC) Delete with compelling evidence of copyright violation, delete per Uncle G. W C M _email 10:37, 28 July 2019 (UTC) reply
• There's no need to presume that it is a copyright violation. It is one. I compared the initial revision of the article to the sources cited. It copies them word for word, and the sources are not in the public domain nor free content. We really should not be merging non-free content into other Wikipedia articles. Or indeed copying and pasting it, as a substitute for actual writing, in the first place. Uncle G ( talk) 00:54, 28 July 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete when an article opens with a claim of "probably committed suicide" and that is the most notable thing about the person the person is not really notable. It some times is discouraging how many articles on non-notable people Wikipedia is plagued with. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.