The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep and close of an unnecessary AFD. My reasons:
Nominator1. quotes the "unreliable" IMDB for budgets stats, 2. does not show understanding (yet) that
film notability is dependent upon coverage, not upon budget. 3. incorrectly asserts a (sourcable) topic's not being sourced as a reason for deletion,
when it is not, 4. repeatedly ignores
WP:BEFORE (when he he actually looked he would have found multiple sources to meet
WP:NF through
WP:GNG), 5. seems to be unaware of
WP:NRVE's instruction that topic notability is dependent upon sources being available and not upon their use or not within an article, 6. AFD is not to be used as a bludgeon to force improvements, and 7.WP:ATD tells us that deletion is not the best solution to addressable issues. In closing this, I urge the nominator to seek a mentor. Per
WP:Deletion policy, I will be tagging the article for work. And to @
Cavarrone: while
the nominatormight withdraw, blatantly unnecessary AFDs are disruptive to the project. Schmidt, Michael Q.00:27, 10 January 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.