The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Grant Nordman (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. While consensus formerly allowed city councillors in Winnipeg to be considered notable per WP:NPOL #3, that consensus has now been deprecated as no longer applicable. There's no substantive evidence here that he's more notable than the norm for a city councillor, however; the referencing is actually entirely to primary sources with the exception of a single news article about him being sad about an accident. Bearcat ( talk) 07:22, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 07:30, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 07:30, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete city councilor in a city too insignificant to grant a notability pass to holders of such a position. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 01:47, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete per outcomes of similar AfDs on Winnipeg City Councillors. K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.