From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Swarm 23:58, 3 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Graham Cox (politician) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is not notable enough for an article ( WP:NPOL) Frinton100 ( talk) 22:12, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. —  JJMC89( T· E· C) 03:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. —  JJMC89( T· E· C) 03:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: A former local councillor and unsuccessful parliamentary candidate, failing WP:NPOLITICIAN. Highbeam and Questia searches return nothing, while Google returns nothing that indicates broader biographical notability. AllyD ( talk) 06:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per above. Run of the mill local pol. Bearian ( talk) 19:00, 29 July 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete -- as we usually do for failed Parliamentary candidates. Peterkingiron ( talk) 17:53, 1 August 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Unelected local politician. Carrite ( talk) 12:55, 2 August 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.