The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Disruptive nomination by a sock farm to further a political agenda — Spaceman Spiff 13:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Gopalrao Patil (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason : Article is of low importance. Person is not well known or notable. Against wiki policies. Possible COI exists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TrulyFan ( talk • contribs) 03:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 00:49, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 00:49, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• Keep Passes WP:NPOL. ^[1] Mentions an entry under former members of Rajya Sabha in his name. ChunnuBhai ( talk) 10:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete seems person is just one time member of rajya sabha. and has not received signficant media coverage.Does not pass WP:NPOL.also article has very less details and it just mentions he is rajya sabha member. IMO this article does not serve wikipedia's purpose. MrLatur ( talk) 16:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete Does not pass NOP basic criteria i.e. trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability. LinkingPark ( talk) 16:44, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• Speedy Keep, as per WP:NPOL all members of national and subnational legislatures, past and present, are deemed notable per default. -- Soman ( talk) 08:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.