The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:49, 30 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Gopal jha (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails as per WP:POLITICIAN. No significant coverage found as per my research. Dial911 ( talk) 19:36, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 20:19, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 20:19, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete. As usual, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for having been candidates in elections they did not win — but nothing else here establishes preexisting notability for other reasons, and none of the sourcing is strong enough to make him a special case over and above most other unsuccessful candidates. Bearcat ( talk) 00:58, 20 November 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. Just about everything needed in a rationale was stated there. Willsome429 ( say hey or see my edits!) 15:16, 28 November 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.