The result was delete. WjB scribe 06:16, 4 May 2007 (UTC) reply
There seems to reason whatsoever to regard this as a topic distinct from common sense, and the article gives no support for the notion that reliable sources exist showing an established and notable distinction or concept here. Wareh 18:50, 28 April 2007 (UTC) reply
There are several definitions for common sense and this article is just showing a "relationship" to one of its definitions. One of the definitions to Common Sense is:
This article is about something established, notable, and unique. In other words, there is no good sense (practical reason) in deleting this article. Lately I have made several major improvements to the article to address some of the issues brought up (i.e. delete dictionary definitions, better references). Had there been discussions I could have made the improvements before this article was just nominated for deletion directly right away (one day after initial improvements made from it as a "stub") because the nominator didn't like the improvements made (didn't meet their personal approval). A nominator should work on improvements, not work on just deleting work done by someone. -- Doug talk 13:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC) reply