The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 02:27, 23 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete See
here,
here and
here. Clearly already established as not notable, therefore G4 applies.
101.182.161.253 (
talk) 10:34, 14 November 2016 (UTC)reply
strong keep it has references and had ninth largest crowd ever and its the biggest thing Professional wrestling or WWE has ever done in Australia 08:32, 16 November 2016
User:Pidzz
Um, there were plenty of notable individual pro wrestling events which weren't offered on pay-per-view, especially considering that supercards predate PPV by many decades. This particular controversy appears to be an outgrowth of longstanding OWN/POV issues perpetuated by certain editors at
Professional wrestling in Australia.
RadioKAOS /
Talk to me, Billy /
Transmissions 23:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)reply
An event doesn't have to be on PPV to pass
WP:GNG but it does have to pass GNG to get an article. This event happens to have not been on PPV and it also happens to not to pass GNG.
LM2000 (
talk) 00:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete and salt This has been deleted multiple times, so therefore
WP:G4 is applied. Also, please salt every article listed above.
Nickag989talk 17:30, 18 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.