The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable video game, currently relying on a single reliable source. While somewhat in-depth, the MCV article reads like a press release / interview, and is bylined to simply "Staff" rather than an author. Searching for other sources mostly just finds name drops of the sort as "IO's new game uses it's Glacier engine", with no significant in-depth coverage of the engine on it's own. Even these passing mentions have less than two pages of results with
WP:VG/S's custom reliable source search. The article has been repeatedly created and redirected, including at
Glacier Engine. --
ferret (
talk)
01:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment: perhaps this could be merged to
IO Interactive? The article has only one source that might reach SIGCOV standard, the MCV story that documents that the engine has been licensed. This isn't enough for a standalone article, but with a little pruning the content is relevant to the IOI article and if the licensing is successful, the case for an independent article might grow. —
Charles Stewart(talk)09:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.