The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep The editor is bringing several articles to Afd that have survived several previous discussions, with no indication whether he's even aware. If he is, if she's intentionally going after such articles and bringing them here without properly formatting his Afds to conceal the many past keep closes, that's disruptive editing. I'm assuming it's accidental. Which amounts to still being disruptive if it continues.
Shawn in Montreal (
talk)
00:15, 25 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment: I don't think the template will link to more than five past AfDs, but here are the fourth and seventh discussions of
Girlfriend, from 2006 and 2008. The fifth and sixth were each within two months of the fourth, and both closed as "speedy keep". There seems to be only one previous nomination of
Boyfriend, in 2004.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.