The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Minimally sourced biography of a person, which literally just states that he existed, the end. It says absolutely nothing of substance about his career to determine whether he would have a credible notability claim under our inclusion standards for either journalists or activists at all -- and for sourcing, all it contains is two different news articles announcing his death, which is not enough coverage to get him over the "notable just because media coverage exists" bar in lieu of having to provide any substantive reasons why he might be notable. Both in substance and sourcing, it takes more than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
17:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.