- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy Withdrawn. convinced by the outstanding arguments of Mr. Gerard and Mr. Easter (non-admin closure) Ysangkok ( talk) 21:24, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Ghash.io
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ghash.io ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable because only has passing mention in mainstream media, and only because of the controversy (which was a news story, doesn't mean it warrants an article) Ysangkok ( talk) 15:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok ( talk) 15:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - extensively cited to mainstream RSes - David Gerard ( talk) 15:36, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 17:55, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Coverage looks more than extensive enough to establish wiki-notability. Saying it only got attention "because of the controversy" is like saying it's only notable for the reason that it is notable. XOR'easter ( talk) 21:19, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.