The result was keep. If there is a good reason given for deletion somewhere in this sock-infested discussion, I certainly can't see it. Black Kite (t) (c) 15:30, 18 June 2011 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The principal source of this article, Suzanne O. Campbell, of San Angelo, Texas, requests that this article be deleted on the grounds that the article conflicts with a potential book on the subject. Billy Hathorn ( talk) 15:02, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
So, would Turner's thesis have been off limits if it had been limited to a lecture at the historical conference in Chicago? Billy Hathorn ( talk) 13:20, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply