The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation if notability can be conclusively established. The Bushranger One ping only 23:36, 4 July 2012 (UTC) reply
This is not the subject of substantial coverage by multiple reliable third party sources. In-depth coverage on which to base a biography is lacking: as far as I can tell, one reliable source gives mostly passing mention including where the subject speaks in his capacity as spokesperson but in coverage about something else entirely ( arkansasnews.com 1: Pearl Harbor Day, arkansasnews.com 2: Pearl Harbor Day, arkansasnews.com 3...bingo!). The sole local source of non-election coverage doesn't seem to give very in-depth coverage. Furthermore, this subject does not rise to WP:POLITICIAN: the subject's candidature is covered somewhat more in-depth, however the coverage as a whole isn't substantially about the subject ( AP 1 AP 2) and is best included in relevant prose about the election elsewhere. JFHJr ( ㊟) 01:26, 27 June 2012 (UTC) reply