- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 10:57, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Gellu Srinivas yadav ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Sole reference only identifies subject as someone who made a legal filing, and does nothing to establish his notability. Article is basically a resume. ubiquity ( talk) 09:10, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete A student leader, who does not seem to have attracted any significant coverage as required for WP:BIO. I had PRODded it; the PROD was removed without comment. -- MelanieN ( talk) 14:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:06, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:06, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable student leader without reliable sources. Fails WP:Notability (people). Vipinhari || talk 17:04, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.