The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:09, 28 April 2010 (UTC) reply
This is my second nomination of this for deletion, and 3rd overall deletion debate the past two ended as no consensus. This article has literally no reliable sources available; everything comes from blogs and fan club like sites. If you want to see my analysis of these sources check the prior afds, and it is obvious they fail WP:RS, another policy that governs these sources is WP:SPS which states, "Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason self-published media, whether books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, Internet forum postings, tweets etc., are largely not acceptable". I understand that this won a minor Paresc award, however with no reliable sources it would be shocking if we allowed this content to stay on Wikipedia. Marcusmax( speak) 02:36, 21 April 2010 (UTC) reply