The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Jenks24 (
talk) 10:38, 25 June 2016 (UTC)reply
A somewhat spammy (now less spammy) article on a non-notable outfit--at least not notable according to the coverage I can find. There's a few mentions in Gay Star News and on the blogs of some publications, but nothing in-depth, nothing notable. Just another business.
Drmies (
talk) 04:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. considerably spammy--quitre repetitive because there's nothing much to say at this point. And consequently, not notable. DGG (
talk ) 21:02, 16 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
B E C K Y S A Y L E S 09:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete, does not meet
WP:GNG, a gsearch brings up nothing useable, have had a look at the references cited (unfortunately some come back as errors) -
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.