- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 00:26, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- Gary Reams ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NPOL criteria. Not elected, small vote garnered. – S. Rich ( talk) 23:08, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:09, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:09, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Minor candidate who receive almost no vote, the article is biased and relies on sources that clearly intend to boost the agenda of this candidate. Comes close to falling under our rules for special consideration when covering fringe ideas and beliefs. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:15, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - unelected politician with no significant coverage. -- Whpq ( talk) 16:41, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable candidate for office with no coverage in independent, reliable sources. Tiller54 ( talk) 17:07, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Unelected politician not showing indication of a GNG pass outside of political activity. Carrite ( talk) 16:24, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.