The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. withdrawn AfD that offered no argument for deletion. This AfD came to no consensus about the notability of the topic.
Barkeep49 (
talk)
01:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment This article has at least some probably reliable sources. The "article created by numerous GDevelop community members" looks like a pure fan cruft without any RS, if I would "vote" delete, I would delete that one.
Pavlor (
talk)
17:57, 11 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Procedural close No deletion rationale. The goal of AFD is to determine the suitability of a topic for Wikipedia based on the notability guidelines. If this discussion were to close as Delete, it would mean the Draft is unsuitable for moving to mainspace and there would be no article at all. That's clearly not what the nom wants. This should be withdrawn and the nom needs to make a request for a
histmerge. --
ferret (
talk)
18:40, 11 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Above !vote for a procedural close is in consideration of what the nom's clear intention is, which is NOT for GDevelop to be deemed non-notable. If others feel the AFD should continue on normal grounds, I'll dig deeper to make a proper keep/delete argument. --
ferret (
talk)
18:42, 11 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Hey all, just checking back in on this. Are we okay to proceed with moving the content from the
Draft:Gdevelop article, keeping the majority of the existing live article content and references, but adding the additional details? Assuming that's acceptable, I can apply that change and this AfD can be closed out.
Trayal (
talk)
23:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Trayal, you can
WP:BOLDLY change the article content. Just a warning that you might end up back here because, based on at least one review of the draft, it's not clear that this topic is
notable (Wikipedia's standard for what does and doesn't get an article). However, this AfD isn't about that and you can use the merge discussion to decide what content best serves this topic. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk)
01:50, 19 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.