From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:16, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Fun Fun Pingu (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find video game sources:  "Fun Fun Pingu" –  news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Contested PROD. Non-notable video game failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources ( WP:VRS), such as WP:VG/RS. No meaningful hits in custom RS search. Usual suspects for review lists do not have any. A quick search in magazines of the time does not bring up any hits. The game's local to Japan, there's no article on JPWP and I'm unable to search in Japanese, but I believe there isn't significant local coverage either. Lack of sources means there is not enough material to write a meaningful article without WP:PLOT and WP:GAMECRUFT and with WP:WAF in mind. —   HELLKNOWZ  ▎ TALK 18:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. —   HELLKNOWZ  ▎ TALK 18:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.