The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:02, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Fritz Coetzee

Fritz Coetzee (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article's subject fails WP:NCRIC and therefore the WP:GNG. Longstanding consensus at WP:CRIC that under-19 international cricketers are not inherently notable. GreenCricket ^TALK 10:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa  Talk  12:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Musa  Talk  12:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Musa  Talk  12:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Musa  Talk  12:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. May be re-created if/when he progresses to the senior national team. IgnorantArmies (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete Per above, fails WP:GNG and WP:NCRIC. Joseph2302 ( talk) 20:59, 15 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.