The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment Haven't seen enough yet to make a determination on notability or lack thereof either here or on the
related nomination of Paletten, but I dispute the notion that
WP:CSK #2 applies here. I've helped process many a nomination by an IP or a new account, and while these have, to put it charitably, varied widely in terms of merit, that does not mean that they have not been made in good faith. Nom is persistent--I'll assume that this is the same person as the one behind the IPs who had AfD-tagged the articles previously (which I reverted as incomplete noms)--but I see no indication that the intent is frivolous, vexatious, or malicious. Unless something new comes up, the discussion should proceed. --
Finngalltalk15:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete This article shows an abyssmal failure to pass GNG. The page from his employer is not indepdent, so we have at best one source that passes GNG, which requires multiple sources, and I do not see strong evidence that even that source passes GNG requirements.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
13:06, 28 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Does not pass
WP:ARTIST nor
WP:GNG; maybe a case of
WP:TOOSOON. Most of the secondary sources on him come from 'aftonbladet', which I don't see as a reliable independent secondary source. I disagree that
WP:CSK#2 applies here, and disagree with the reasons given to invoke it here. Walwal20talk ▾
contribs07:57, 29 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment My only question is whether there's an argument for
WP:NPROF C8 or similar here. Editorship of a well-established publication like Palatten is not nothing. (But this is the only assertion of notability in the article, and I didn't see anything else on searching.)
Russ Woodroofe (
talk)
08:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete in the absence of anyone making a case that being one of 3 chief-editors for an art magazine confers notability, and with no other evidence in sight of notability.
Russ Woodroofe (
talk)
08:40, 4 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.