The result was delete. causa sui ( talk) 18:17, 18 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The subject of this article fails Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. I have been unable to find significant coverage about him.
Analysis of the sources in the article:
Verbatim sentence from source:
From Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universe Today (3rd nomination), Astrocog ( talk · contribs) wrote:
I also looked at Fraser Cain's page, and I have to say I think it may be up for deletion in the future, too. There's just not enough to go on. Because somebody has an asteroid named after them is not enough. Asteroids are named by the people who find them, generally amateur astronomers, who name asteroids after friends or people they admire. The amateur who named the asteroid was likely a listener of Cain's podcast. Look, I wish this were not the case, because I like Cain and the work he does. But my personal appreciation of AstronomyCast is not enough to be lax on standards.
— User:Astrocog 14:49, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
A Google News Archive search ("Fraser Cain" -"by Fraser Cain") and a Google Books search return no secondary reliable sources about him.
Because this article fails Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, and because the subject fails Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, this page should be deleted. Cunard ( talk) 06:45, 10 September 2011 (UTC) reply