The result was no consensus. While there is a majority of people voicing keep opinions here reading the discussion reveals a split between whether the coverage is sufficient to establish notability or whether the coverage fails WP:NOT#NEWS. As such am closing as no consensus. Davewild ( talk) 10:09, 28 November 2009 (UTC) reply
A non-governmental medal awarded by an organization with dubious notability. Has been deleted from ru-wiki already. Óðinn ☭☆ talk 07:38, 6 November 2009 (UTC) reply
- Medal "For peace enforcement"
Regional public organization with the enterprise for the production of symbols has established a medal. Sources other than the site organization is not given. The significance of the organization under a big question. Pessimist2006 08:35, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- Add. Establishment of the awards was widely reported in the press [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]. SashaT 10:00, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- X Delete a momentary interest in the press, but there is no encyclopedic value. Seelöwe 10:02, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- X Delete - no award, but a PR stunt. Wikipedia writes about the medals, but not their virtual display on websites or promotional campaigns, producers of symbols. In an article on the organization itself was looked would be appropriate .-- Vissarion 11:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- X Remove this medal has no significance .-- I. 15:48, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- X Delete. Not significantly ShinePhantom 08:30, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- Outcome
Removed under discussion. EvgenyGenkin 01:09, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
In response to Óðinn ( talk · contribs): notability is defined by whether or not a topic has received enough reliable sources. Because For Enforcing Peace has received this coverage, it not being a state decoration is irrelevant when deciding whether it meets Wikipedia's inclusion policy. Cunard ( talk) 08:12, 21 November 2009 (UTC) reply