The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep - aren't flags generally deemed to be sufficiently notable to sustain a stand alone article?
WP:GNG seems to be met, no problem with referencing in this article.
Mjroots (
talk)
16:36, 28 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep The C of E here. The article fulfils GNG as it has the reliable 3rd party sources required. It is not a FORK as this contains more information here than the city page as well as presenting it neutrally. In fact, half of the mentions on the city page are unsourced assertions.
The Royal C (
talk)
18:12, 28 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Weak keep the Trenton article is slim and this information could easily be merged into it, but as others have noted, flag articles are commonplace too, so I'm not sure about the benefit to the reader in deleting this. It is worth noting that the main Trenton article seems to contain facts about the flag that aren't actually featured in the flag article, so that should be remedied.
The Rambling Man (
talk)
20:04, 28 October 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.