From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 02:11, 26 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Finding water

Finding water (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For background, this started life as a Neelix redirect and was brought up at RfD, along with many variants, at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 November 12. As of right now, the discussion is still open.

While this page attempts to solve that problem, it does so by creating a disambiguation page completely against the relevant guideline, MOS:DAB. Dowsing is the only topic linked there that could be referred to as "Finding water", and none of the others meet the MOS:DABMENTION standard. A water detector may be a device for finding water, but that phrase isn't a likely search term for that topic. We wouldn't redirect Heating food to Microwave oven, or Digging holes to Shovel. This page should revert to a redirect and follow the outcome of the aforementioned RfD. BDD ( talk) 20:57, 19 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. BDD ( talk) 20:59, 19 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Keep There's actually a lot more to finding water than the start entries I put in the dab page. For example it is a crucial survival skill. It is an important scientific technique in biology. It is tropism. It is important for extra-terrestrial colonies. It is a technique in industry. All the best: Rich  Farmbrough, 21:06, 19 November 2015 (UTC). reply
True, but not especially relevant to the validity of this as a disambiguation page. That's more an argument for an article, or information to be incorporated into Water. -- BDD ( talk) 21:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Precisely. The RfD should have been allowed to resolve first. -- BDD ( talk) 16:00, 21 November 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.