The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. It appears to be quite clear that his political career came to nothing. The fact that the article is 6 years out of date, and unreferenced, is a cautionary tale against lowering the notability bar too far. --
Mkativerata (
talk) 10:27, 18 July 2014 (UTC)reply
No strong claim of
notability that would get him past
WP:POLITICIAN (highest office ever attained is a municipal committee? er, no) — and the article relies exclusively on a
user-generated database for referencing, without so much as a shred of
reliable source coverage to explain why he would belong in an encyclopedia. In addition, the article was created by
User:ProfLiberté, implying a potential
conflict of interest as the article identifies its subject as a
libertarian and the creator has never made any other contributions to Wikipedia at all. Delete.
Bearcat (
talk) 03:33, 20 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - I cannot find any evidence this person passes
WP:GNG or
WP:NPOL. --
Whpq (
talk) 16:37, 22 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Holder of a postion so minor, that it would not make him notable in any city.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 22:28, 23 July 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.