The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 02:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Possible hoax, as someone from the public asserted. Not really sure, but it is plausible, so bringing this to AFD. NW ( Talk) 02:54, 21 September 2010 (UTC) reply
It is not hoax. You can check from Encyclopedia of Turkish Authors vol. III as cited in the article. He is rather unknown to common people who are not deeply involved in Turkish politics. Alexanderanenko ( talk) 07:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC) — Alexanderanenko ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
The reference is also bogus. There is no encyclopedia with the title "Türk Yazarlar Ansiklopedisi" as cited in the article. There is one "Türkiye Yazarlar Ansiklopedisi" though, yet it does not contain a Fatih Rıfat Ülküman. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.178.92 ( talk) 10:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Ps. His haters mention that there is no article stands in Wikipedia Turkish which is right, but just because the number of the results in English is more then it comes up in Turkish doesn't mean that he is not real. A good example for this situation is Orhan Pamuk with this kind of weird determination methods we can claim that Orhan Pamuk doesn't exist . Other than that there is no problem with the name of "Türk Yazarlar Ansiklopedisi" as his clear intention of misleading the administrators here stands i must make something clear.Türkiye is the name of the country like US and we don't call it America Idol, or America Plant Encylopedia ,same in Turkish we call it Türk Yazarlar Ansiklopedisi(Turk Respresent any human being who lives in Turkey or has a Turkish Origin).As my last sentences please guy don't waste your time to remove the sign's that has given to the path of history by such a great person even you removed it from everywhere else we will always remember him.
alparslan2 ( talk) 17:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC) — alparslan2 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
The article should be removed due to the fact that "Fatih Rıfat Ülküman" is a bogus historian created by an "ekşi sözlük" ( http://sourtimes.org) web site user, in order to lay down an hoax that provides a false claim that Mustafa Kemal Atatürk had ordered the execution of his former brothers-in-arms ( http://www.eksisozluk.com/show.asp?t=fatih+r%C4%B1fat+%C3%BClk%C3%BCman and http://www.eksisozluk.com/show.asp?t=ismet+ben+%C3%B6l%C3%BCrsem+adnan%27%C4%B1+ve+celal%27i+ast%C4%B1r). The existence of such an author named "Fatih Rıfat Ülküman" could be checked from the National Library of Turkey ( http://www.mkutup.gov.tr/index.php?yenidil=ing) and also from Bilkent University Library online catalogues ( http://librarycatalog.bilkent.edu.tr/uhtbin/cgisirsi.exe/x/0/0/49) which are the two of the richest sources on Turkish books). It should be noted that the article is lacking any citeable sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.109.143 ( talk) 18:37, 24 September 2010 (UTC) reply