The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Ok. It’s tedious to check that, but I believe you. I can find no evidence of notability. If evidence for notability lies in Russian sources, I tell the proponents to add these sources to the native language Wikipedia article, which is
here. I suspect it could be notable, but at the moment the Russian Wikipedia article is inadequately sourced. —
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
22:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:IAR and
WP:CREEP. I’m unable to see how the encyclopedia or reader experience is improved by following the destructive Afd and notability guidelines which indicate this and many other informative and factually accurate articles need to be deleted. The guidelines need to be revamped to remove their destructive effects, but in the meantime we must simply ignore them per IAR, a pillar policy. —-
В²C☎16:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.