The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 16:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC) reply
non notable software, speedy removed by SPA who has admitted COI with the software author in an edit summary Wuh Wuz Dat 19:15, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
I have edited the article to remove any non-encyclopedic content and to change it to a neutral point of view. (As I mentioned elsewhere, I used Microsoft Excel and Crystal Reports as my guides.) I didn't edit for notability, as I didn't find this page until just now, but I had already realized that the article was short of non-related and non-sales type references, and intend to begin researching such references right now. I also realized that after I turned all the comma-delimited lists of features into bulleted lists of features, the article looks kind of list-heavy. I will also try to remedy that when I learn more about the software. Thank you for your work on behalf of the project. I gain more respect for it the more I read, and will try my best to follow the guidelines. Kimnathans ( talk) 21:15, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
I have also added some external references to the article. Kimnathans ( talk) 22:33, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Is there anything else that could be done to improve this article? Kimnathans ( talk) 16:38, 18 December 2009 (UTC) reply
I added some book citations to the article. Would it be best to delete some of the primary source press releases? Thanks! Kimnathans ( talk) 22:21, 18 December 2009 (UTC) reply