The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Subject lacks notability. Two articles from one published source:local newspaper. No major media. No national coverage
Tapered (
talk) 01:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep meets
WP:GNG which does not specify that the media has to be 'national', also 'major' is a subjective term, Sarcasm alert, yes the newspaper is only a 'local' one, serving that small town on the eastern seaboard of the US
New York :)
Coolabahapple (
talk) 02:13, 30 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 04:15, 31 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete for failing
WP:BIO and
WP:GNG. She put the "active" in activist, but not at a high enough level to merit an article. Wikipedia is not a memorial.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 05:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Nothing here particularly demonstrates that the topic merits a permanent article in an international encyclopedia — and the volume of sourcing isn't nearly enough to claim that she satisfies
WP:GNG. Coolabahapple is right that nothing in GNG specifically requires the media to be national rather than local, but there has to be a lot more of it than this — if two articles in a local community weekly newspaper were all it took to satisfy GNG, we'd have to keep an article about every person who ever organized a church bake sale or served on a PTA. Delete.
Bearcat (
talk) 02:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)reply
delete Clearly beloved by her neighborhood, the obituary her Congressman read into the Congressional Record says only that she was active in the church, in her neighborhood, and that she was much loved. Couldn't access Amsterdam News obit online. Can find no coverage during her lifetime.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 20:11, 7 April 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.