The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. Article does need improvement, but state legislators pass
WP:NPOL #1. Notability is judged by the existence of suitable sources, not just their presence in the current version of the article as written.
Bearcat (
talk)
13:41, 24 May 2019 (UTC)reply
keep I cant see what the problem is.
The version of the article when it was nominated is completely fine. Subject is/was elected member of legislative assembly, which is verified. Thus fulfilling
WP:NPOL. There are no copyrights, or BLP violations. None of the content is unsourced. I am still not sure, are we having this discussion because the article is a stub? —usernamekiran
(talk)07:25, 28 May 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.