The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Merge Per nom. The article fails to make a good argument for how the factions have been discussed as a group. The Covenant and Flood are notable, but they already have their own articles. The rest can be summarized on the series page fairly easily if the extraneous material is removed.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
10:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment. Polygon spends the better first half of this article discussing the factions
[1], and there's
[2] and
[3] if you like Valnet, but there's less out there than I would have guessed. The thing stopping me from !voting merge is that the suggested target article is already 6,600 words, and merging even a portion of this 4,300 word article is well into
WP:SIZESPLIT territory. ~
A412talk!16:24, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The article is large but a lot of the development section may be redundant. It's not even specifically about the factions.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
23:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I think I agree with a merge to various targets after going through the sections:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting. There is a consensus to Merge but disagreement on what the target article(s) should be. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk!05:28, 7 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.