- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 13:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Everyday Feminism
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Everyday Feminism ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable website. Only two sources not published by the website are used in the article. One is simply MetroUK reposting cartoons that were originally posted on Everyday Feminism without much coverage of Everyday Feminism itself, and the other is a multi-person blog called Ravishly. While they do have a verified Twitter, that doesn't automatically confer them notability and many websites/people with verified Twitters aren't notable. Same here. Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 05:54, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 05:54, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 05:54, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 05:54, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 05:54, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: does not meet GNG and it reads like more of an advertisement for the website than an article. – DarkGlow ( talk) 16:56, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - I looked, but could not find multiple reliable secondary sources with significant coverage per WP:GNG. Regardless of the likely good intentions of the creator and past editors of the article, I believe WP:NOTSPAM comes into play as well. The website does sell " webinars" like this one about "Astrology as Healing Work" for $39. -Crossroads- ( talk) 05:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: As article creator I just wanted to clarify that I have never had any affiliation with this website, though I was a frequent reader of it at the time I created the article. I don't feel strongly about whether or not this article should be kept at this time. Funcrunch ( talk) 19:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- So, I looked up: "Everyday feminism" sandra kim. And found : https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Everyday+feminism%22++sandra+kim&safe=active&client=firefox-b-d&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiDrZvN4uHmAhV8REEAHSGSBc0Q_AUoAnoECAwQBA&biw=1270&bih=719. Looking up just : "Everyday feminism" brings up : https://www.google.com/search?safe=active&client=firefox-b-d&biw=1270&bih=719&tbm=nws&ei=sjsMXvz1MpK6gAb1vrCgDg&q=%22Everyday+feminism%22++&oq=%22Everyday+feminism%22++&gs_l=psy-ab.3...124421.125747.0.126442.10.10.0.0.0.0.137.1159.0j9.9.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..1.0.0....0.QISFAlfQZmI . I am, however, not quite certain how much news coverage a political website needs in order to have an article. NotButtigieg ( talk) 06:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.