From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Educational_technology#Over-stimulation. MBisanz talk 13:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Everest Syndrome (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism, very few citations or references other than by the inventor. Most searches for "everest syndrome" yield something else. Vectro ( talk) 06:28, 22 November 2016 (UTC) reply

This may be irrelevant but did you come here from reddit too? Support deletion or merge, btw Koopatrev ( talk; contrib) 06:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Looks like jargon known only to a small in-group or clique of teachers and virtually no-one else. I don't think there's sufficient notability to allow for it to be kept or merged. Support deletion. Maswimelleu ( talk) 09:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Thirty plus years in education, many as a leader in classroom tech initiatives. This phenomenon exists but I've never heard it referred to by this term. It may belong in an article discussing technology in the classroom but doesn't seem enough for a separate page. (Yep, reddit TIL) TBoaN ( talk) 01:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 11:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.