The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is clear that this subject does not meet the notability guidelines. As for redirecting/merging, there is no target to merge to and the current article does not mention the film in any detail worth creating a stand-alone article from. If and when an article about the film is created, this can be recreated as a redirect. And if someone really needs the text to create such an article about the film, I'm willing to provide a copy for this purposes if asked. Regards SoWhy 12:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Non notable film maker. No mentions in press, search pulls up non RS primaries, fails GNG and all 4 criterion of
WP:NFILMMAKERL3X1(distant write) 16:33, 21 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
GeoffreyT2000 (
talk) 00:16, 29 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete does not pass the notability guidelines for filmmakers, not enough sources to pass GNG.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 18:53, 29 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep and move, per
User:In ictu oculi's reasonable suggestion. This leaves a redirect behind. --
doncram 21:15, 29 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
d.g. L3X1(distant write) 13:26, 3 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete Googling the film yields nothing but self-published results/PR releases. Which are the 22 film festivals? I highly doubt any of them is notable.
Timmyshin (
talk) 17:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: 4D 2K and a move.
Delete. The best may be yet to come, but it isn't here yet. One short film without any awards claimed doesn't satisfy
WP:CREATIVE by a wide margin.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 00:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as this individual clearly doesn't meet either
WP:GNG or
WP:NCREATIVE. The suggestion to create an article about the film and then redirect there would be a good one, if the film itself were notable, but I see no evidence of that either.
Onel5969TT me 12:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.