The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Simply not a real rivalry. For some reason, the topic of "rivalries" is cherished by many, therefore some users create articles on rivalries on flimsy grounds. The policies that is failed here would be
WP:OR and
WP:SYNTH.
Geschichte (
talk)
10:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete Did the Tunisian soccer team social admin write this? Even for the general standard of rivalry article notability not being met, if I was a fan of EQ I'd be on the talk page yelling about the biased tone of this article with that lede alone. Nate•(
chatter)20:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete The two national teams are so far apart both geographically and in terms of magnitude of success. The tone of the article is just really petty.
KingSkyLord (
talk |
contribs)
20:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: In addition to OR and SYNTH cited by the nom, this is a failure of
WP:NRIVALRY because of a lack of significant, reliable coverage covering this series as a rivalry. Routine match reports and statistics don't cut it.
Let'srun (
talk)
01:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete—Very obviously not an actual rivalry. I'm amazed the article's creator got so many words into the article, honestly.
Anwegmann (
talk)
20:08, 14 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.