The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
keep Appears to be a perfectly verifiable book. I don't get what's "purely promotional" about this article, from looking the article history. It is also used to help with citing sources, example
Robert John Braidwood. --
W.marsh19:41, 12 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep. I added the article, hoping to expand it at a later date, because I was referring to the work in various anthropology-related articles. I neither work for the publisher or any other company related to the book, and have no financial interest in seeing it promoted (indeed, I imagine that it will sell much to anyone except libraries, making promotion faitly redundant; SAGE will presumably already have that covered). --
Mel Etitis (
Μελ Ετητης)
19:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment If there were some links to the more significant articles in which it is a necessary reference, it would be more obvious that it is a page needed by other pages. If it was expanded by a hundred words or so rather promptly, I'd say keep. s it is, it is doing no harm so I certainly wouldn't say delete.
Midgley21:38, 12 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.