From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Morzin Palace. (Non-admin closure)-- Antigng ( talk) 13:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Embassy of Romania, Prague (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Unreferenced for 8.5 years. Embassies are not inherently notable. This one is located in a historical building, but the building has its own article and is notable in its own right. LibStar ( talk) 15:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 15:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 15:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 15:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Possible redirect to the building's article? Since embassies aren't inherently notable but apparently the building is. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 10:16, 10 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Merge (not just redirect) to Morzin Palace as suggested by Naruto. This article contains some information about the building which is not present in the building's article. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain ( talk) 05:59, 15 February 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.