The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn as article now redirected. LibStar ( talk) 14:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Embassy of Moldova, Prague (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Embassies are not inherently notable and there's no bilateral article to redirect this one too either. LibStar ( talk) 14:29, 6 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 14:37, 6 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Moldova-related deletion discussions. Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 14:39, 6 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 14:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 14:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC) reply

• Redirect (changed from keep or move) to the bilateral relations article that is appropriate to have, but does not yet currently exist. I am trying to remember specific similar past AFDs resolved this way. I think it seems to be the case that bilateral relationships between 2 countries are valid topics, so move this to start that topic and leave redirect behind. The deletion nomination itself implicitly acknowledges that a bilateral relations article would be a valid redirect target. So just create that valid topic, perhaps by moving this and a little editing. That would not be controversial, does not require an AFD. -- do ncr am 22:05, 6 September 2014 (UTC) reply
• Comment There is now Czech-Moldova relations article, created by move of this embassy article to that topic, by me. Similar to resolution of several other AFDs in favor of redirects (e.g. redirects to Czech-Mexico relations, Italy-Moldova relations) this could now be closed as "Redirect", please. I hope no more AFDs like this will be created, as AFD process is costly and an embassy page can simply be moved without an AFD process. -- do ncr am 12:07, 8 September 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.