The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:58, 16 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Embassy of Indonesia, Lisbon (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Embassies are not inherently notable. This has been marked for notability concerns, 3.5 years ago. The history section is not even about the embassy. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar ( talk) 02:00, 9 July 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Indonesia, and Portugal. LibStar ( talk) 02:00, 9 July 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete. The embassy itself is far from notable. Too many conflate "relations" pages with "embassy" pages. Geschichte ( talk) 12:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.